Research Engagement bundle · for Sponsor BD · Site Research Ops
Engage patients, physicians, and sites in one research network
Reach the people who make research happen — patients reporting outcomes, physicians at the point of care, and sites ready to enroll — on one governed OMOP record instead of three disconnected channels.
The problem today
Sponsor BD and site research ops engage patients, providers, and sites through separate tools and relationship-driven outreach, with no shared data thread tying ePRO, point-of-care matching, and site feasibility together.
Faster
Faster site identification
Sponsors find OMOP-mapped sites with real eligible-patient density through structured, freshness-stamped capability profiles instead of months of relationship-driven outreach.
Better
Engagement on real data
Patient ePRO, physician point-of-care evidence, and site capability profiles all read and write the same governed OMOP record, so every interaction is grounded in real-world data rather than self-reported snapshots.
Cheaper
One network, not three vendors
Patient engagement, point-of-care decision support, and site matchmaking run on one platform and one data model, replacing separate ePRO, CDS, and site-finding stacks.
How this bundle composes
Engage patients, providers, sponsors, and sites in one research network — from ePRO and eConsent to point-of-care trial matching, feasibility, and sponsor-site introductions.
Patients report outcomes, sign consent, and keep a diary in one app whose data lands as a governed OMOP record alongside their own EHR timeline.
Physicians see similar-patient outcomes and the closest-fit guideline match for the patient in front of them, inside their own EHR, at the moment of care.
Sponsors and CROs find and engage research sites with real, OMOP-derived capability profiles, and sites gain platform value back for participating.
Why it holds up
- Patient-reported data from Compass and physician-facing evidence in Cue resolve to the same OMOP person, visit, and outcome context the rest of CuRE reads.
- Cue surfaces similar-patient outcomes and guideline match inside the EHR via SMART on FHIR, with point-of-care trial eligibility matching positioned as the buyer-facing wedge that moves eligible patients toward study operations.
- Commons computes site capability profiles from real OMOP data rather than a self-reported PDF, and its data-as-currency model provisions sites free Cue access in exchange for participation.
- Compass's eConsent, ePRO, and dosing diaries ship in one patient app instead of three stitched-together vendors, sending OMOP-standardized records back through the platform.
The apps in this bundle
Patients report outcomes, sign consent, and keep a diary in one app whose data lands as a governed OMOP record alongside their own EHR timeline.
- The patient's own EHR record (via SMART on FHIR) sits alongside study-collected data — most ePRO tools only see what the study asks.
- ePRO windows open automatically off the study's visit schedule — Control authors the schedule once and Compass opens the right survey in the right window, no manual per-patient setup.
Physicians see similar-patient outcomes and the closest-fit guideline match for the patient in front of them, inside their own EHR, at the moment of care.
- Lives inside the physician's existing EHR — no separate app to log into.
- Answers the physician's question grounded in THIS patient's chart via SMART-on-FHIR context — the 2025-26 point-of-care AI bar — not a textbook lookup.
Sponsors and CROs find and engage research sites with real, OMOP-derived capability profiles, and sites gain platform value back for participating.
- Data-as-currency reciprocity: sites get free Cue, cleaned-data give-back, and network analytics while sponsors trade engagement rather than raw data.
- Live network patient counts against eligibility criteria — the TriNetX wedge — on CuRE's own federated OMOP.
See the Research Engagement bundle in action
Every research ecosystem is unique. Let's discuss how CuRE can be configured for your team.